Enter Your Research Topic
Start with a topic, question, or area of inquiry. You can also choose whether you want a standard systematic literature review or a meta-analysis. An optional year filter helps narrow the search scope when needed.
Automate your systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis workflow with Gatsbi Reviewer - from intelligent study screening and data extraction to bias assessment, statistical synthesis, and structured manuscript generation. Built for researchers, students, clinicians, and academic professionals who need rigorous outputs without the usual manual burden.
Start with a topic, question, or area of inquiry. You can also choose whether you want a standard systematic literature review or a meta-analysis. An optional year filter helps narrow the search scope when needed.
Gatsbi Reviewer searches across major academic databases, screens relevant studies, and prepares a candidate list for your review.
You can select or deselect studies and upload your own PDFs if you want to include papers not retrieved automatically.
Choose the workflow path based on your review objective.
You can export extracted raw data and key results, then continue refining the manuscript for submission, reporting, or internal use.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are often slowed down by repetitive manual tasks: searching, screening, extracting effect sizes, checking bias, generating plots, and writing up results. Gatsbi Reviewer brings these steps into one workflow so you can move from topic to evidence synthesis far more efficiently.
Browse sample SLR drafts generated by Gatsbi Reviewer.
Enter your research topic and let Gatsbi Reviewer automatically search across major academic databases, identify relevant papers, and screen candidate studies for inclusion. Instead of starting from a blank spreadsheet, you begin with an AI-assisted shortlist.
Best for:
For eligible studies, Gatsbi Reviewer can extract key quantitative fields such as effect sizes, confidence intervals, sample sizes, and other structured data needed for downstream synthesis. This reduces one of the most time-consuming parts of meta-analysis preparation.
What this helps you do:
Gatsbi Reviewer includes an integrated meta-analysis workflow that supports fixed-effect models, random-effects models, forest plots, funnel plots, heterogeneity metrics (I², Q), and publication bias assessment. This makes it easier to generate interpretable quantitative outputs without stitching together multiple external tools.
Assess included studies with RoB (Risk of Bias) and GRADE-like quality scoring, guided by AI suggestions to help structure your evaluation workflow.
Why it matters:
Once your evidence base is ready, Gatsbi Reviewer can generate a structured review manuscript in minutes.
Depending on the workflow, the output can include:
Gatsbi Reviewer is designed to preserve and format citations during writing, helping you maintain traceability between source evidence and the draft manuscript. The product page also highlights direct access to Google Scholar data for citation-aware workflows.
From study identification to manuscript generation, Gatsbi Reviewer is designed to cover the full evidence synthesis pipeline in one place.
Automatically retrieve, rank, and screen relevant studies based on your research topic, reducing the time spent on manual triage.
Run quantitative synthesis without external coding workflows. Generate pooled results, forest plots, funnel plots, and heterogeneity statistics directly inside the platform.
Create a clear, publication-oriented draft with sections such as Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion, plus tables, plots, and references where applicable.
Gatsbi Reviewer highlights PRISMA-oriented structure, standardized metrics, and reproducible outputs to support transparent academic reporting.
Designed for users who want advanced evidence synthesis workflows without needing statistics software or programming experience.
Most tools help with only one part of the review process - search, screening, analysis, or writing. Gatsbi Reviewer is positioned as a more integrated workflow that connects:
topic input -> study screening -> data extraction -> meta-analysis -> manuscript generation
That means fewer tool switches, less manual coordination, and a faster path to a usable draft.
Researchers Speed up evidence synthesis while maintaining methodological structure and traceable outputs.
Graduate Students and PhD Candidates Generate a stronger first draft for literature reviews and quantitative syntheses without building the full workflow manually.
Clinicians and Health Researchers Use structured screening, extraction, and synthesis workflows to accelerate review-based research projects.
Policy and Grant Writers Create evidence-backed review outputs for policy briefs, research proposals, and funding applications.
Generate a structured SLR draft from a research topic with automated study screening and thematic synthesis.
Extract quantitative data, run pooled analysis, and generate results sections with plots and heterogeneity statistics.
Use review outputs as a foundation for journal manuscripts, theses, dissertations, and conference papers.
Accelerate the early stages of evidence collection and synthesis when timelines are tight.